|
"Tee
Time"
A WebQuest for inquiring
minds
Designed by Rebecca
"Captain" McLelland
Introduction
| Learners | Standards
| Process | Resources |
Evaluation
| Conclusion | Credits
| Student Page
Introduction
This lesson was created as part
of a Perth Amboy School District professional development and computer
training workshop through ETTC in East Brunswick.
Throughout this investigation the
students will assume their assigned roles as citizens in a town meeting
where wealthy investors have persuaded the city government to clear an
area of town to build a golf course. They are to investigate their roles
and prepare a speech in support or in rejection of the golf course. As
a culminating activity, the students will present their cases in a mock
council meeting.
Learners
This lesson was designed to be
used with Perth Amboy High School Biology and Marine Biology students (grades
10-12). A background knowledge of environmental pollutants is helpful,
but not necessary.
Curriculum Standards
(NJCCCS)
Science Standards Addressed
(directly and indirectly)
-
Standard 5.12: All Students
Will Develop An Understanding Of The Environment As A System Of Interdependent
Components Affected By Human Activity And Natural Phenomena
Descriptive Statement:
Creating an awareness of the need to protect and preserve natural resources
is a goal of science education. This standard calls for students to develop
knowledge of environmental issues, including management of natural resources,
production and use of energy, waste management, and the interdependence
of ecosystems.
-
Standard 5.4: All Students
Will Develop An Understanding Of Technology As An Application Of Scientific
Principles
Descriptive Statement:
Understanding the unique interdependence of science and technology is an
important goal of science education. This standard is an attempt to show
students how the application of scientific knowledge can be used to improve
the human condition and how technological development affects the quality
of life.
The
Process
-
Students be assigned a role along
with others in the same area of interest
-
Groups should be equally and fairly
divided (size and motivation of members)
-
Each member will be required to attend
an actual Perth
Amboy Council Meeting to familiarize themselves with the process of
addressing the council.
-
They can use the Internet sites provided
as starting points for research, but other sources for their role may be
needed.
-
Groups can decide if they wish to
have one speaker represent their group or if each member will speak on
their own.
-
They will construct a list of twenty
reasons in support of or rejecting the golf course (as indicated by their
role). They will have one week from the starting date to complete this
part of the research. This list must be approved before the eighth day
of the research time span.
-
The speech will then be written within
the following week and must be checked at least twice during that time
for persuasiveness, attention to details, support/statistics and readability.
-
As they prepare their speech for the
meeting they should be reminded that it must be at least 3 minutes long,
but no longer than 15 minutes for the entire group. They should have visuals
available to use (flip boards, flowcharts, handouts, photos, etc.) to stress
the important points of their argument.
-
The final speech for the mock council
meeting can be written on note cards or paper, or it can be memorized.
All group members must have a specific role in the council meeting presentation,
even if one person is the chosen speaker. In order to seem convincing the
group needs to focus on sounding real, mature and educated.
The Players: (description
for students)
Environmentalists
Golf Enthusiasts
Concerned Citizens
Proponents for Urban
Revitalization
The environmentalists
believe that there are several ecological problems associated with the
building and maintaining
of this golf course, especially along Raritan Bay. In order to understand
their thought process you will need to check out these web sites:
http://water.usgs.gov/pubs/circ1156/circ1156.4B.html
http://www.acnatsci.org/erd/ea/8polln1.html
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/NPS/
http://www.epa.gov/OWOW/info/NewsNotes/issue35/nps35new.html
http://www.epa.gov/owowwtr1/NPS/wpt/wpt02/wpt02-20.html
http://www.epa.gov/owowwtr1/estuaries/coastlines/fall98/ipm.html
http://www.epa.gov/owowwtr1/NPS/wpt/wpt02/wpt02-27.html
"U.S. Urged to Help States Fight
Coastal Pollution From Runoff", "Salmon Put on U.S. List as at Risk" by
Sam Howe Verhovek and "Golf-Course Growth Raises Environmental Issues"
by Eleanor Charles are just a few articles on the NY
TIMES site that will be of interest to you.
The golf
enthusiasts LOVE golf, LIVE golf, and believe that having
an interest in golf improves ones character. Aside from their obvious desire
to have a golf course closer to home, they want to prove that golfing in
Perth Amboy will provide peace and harmony, as well as an economic boom.
If you are a golfer, you'll need to take your golf cart along these sites:
http://www.golfsd.com/kids_golf.html
http://www.1golf.com/astate.htm
http://inventors.about.com/science/inventors/library/inventors/blgolf.htm
"Linking Good Golf and Good Business"
by Adam Bryant and " Greens Peace - A controversial new theory about
the true causes of war and peace -- in 18 holes or less." by David
Plotz are examples of New York Times
articles you should read to help support your case.
Concerned citizens think
that building a golf course is excessive when not enough low income housing
is available in town. These people want to know why the site will be made
into a golf course when there are people
who would benefit from low income housing along that stretch of land. You
may not want to see a golf course there, but it is not for environmental
reasons. You want to help out the less fortunate and feel that the golf
course is a slap in the face to the people you advocate. Gain support from
these sites:
http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/14mon1.html
http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/ny-illegal-apartments.html
http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/ny-family-poverty.html#2
http://www.nytimes.com/library/national/gallery.html
The proponents for urban
revitalization want something to move into that eye-sore of a neighborhood
that would equal financial benefits for Perth Amboy. They believe in a
simple mathematical equation: golf course
= property taxes paid by golf course + jobs for local people + influx of
wealthier people to the area + higher home values. To find out why, visit
these online sources:
http://www.fcw.com/civic/articles/1999/CIVIC_120699_46.asp
http://www.state.nj.us/osp/plan/sdrpsp07.htm
http://www.michiganinbrief.org/text/issues/issue-63.htm
http://www.epa.gov/region02/epd/97151.htm
Variations
-
Ask teachers to act as the council
or seek out your local council to participate in the event.
-
Have the students interact with different
class sections instead of with their own. This way their speeches will
appear even more realistic.
-
Shorten or lengthen the time span
according to your classroom needs and available resources.
Resources Needed
-
Internet ready computer lab
-
E-mail accounts for all students
-
Teacher attendance at a city council
meeting to understand proper procedure
-
The teacher should investigate the
links on this page to understand the problems associated with the proposed
land use.
-
You may use other teachers to act
as council members or contact your city council directly.
Evaluation
The students should have a deeper
understanding of city planning and the associated environmental issues
at the completion of this lesson. The following rubric may be used for
your convenience:
|
Beginning
10 |
Developing
15 |
Accomplished
20 |
Exemplary
25 |
Score |
List
of pros or cons
(completed individually within one
week of start date) |
Have at least
8 supporting reasons for your speech and completed within time frame.
|
Have at least
15 supporting reasons for your speech and completed within time frame.
|
Have at least
20 supporting reasons for your speech and completed within time frame.
|
Have at least
25 supporting reasons for your speech and completed within time frame.
|
|
|
Attending and
summarizing an actual council meeting
|
Attended meeting
and completed a one paragraph summary of the event.
|
Attended meeting
and completed a well written, one paragraph summary of the event.
|
Attended meeting
and completed a well written, two paragraph summary of the event.
|
Attended meeting
and completed a well written, three paragraph summary of the event.
|
|
Construction
of
speech
|
on time, but
lacks details, uses slang instead of appropriate language, not very persuasive,
unrealistic approach
|
on time and
has a few supporting details, uses mostly appropriate language, but is
not extremely persuasive
|
on time and
has many supporting details, uses appropriate language and is pretty persuasive
|
on time, a lot
of supporting details,
appropriate and
mature language, extremely persuasive
|
|
|
Class performance/
presentation of speech
|
lacks enthusiasm,
little to no supporting details mentioned, very little eye contact, seems
rushed or unrealistic
|
mildly enthusiastic,
little support, some eye contact, yet voice seems uncomfortable and has
no visuals
|
pretty enthusiastic
and solid, but may need a few more days to polish, some visuals, good voice
projection, higher level vocabulary and grammar
|
solid presentation,
has visuals, enthusiasm, seems real, assumed the true role assigned, excellent
voice projection, higher level vocabulary and grammar
|
|
|
Conclusion
At the completion of this investigation
the students should be able to answer these questions:
-
After hearing all of the arguments,
would you want a golf course in Perth Amboy?
-
Do the advantages outweigh the dangers
or inconveniences?
-
Could your argument persuade you if
you did not hold that opinion?
The issues involved in this
WebQuest do not apply only to golf courses, but to any type of development.
When something is built in a neighborhood, it is your civic responsibility
to ask questions and have a complete understanding about who will be effected.
If you believe that a project will cause more harm than good, then take
a stand against it.
Credits
Special thanks to Carol James and
Middlesex County ETTC for the inspiration on designing this WebQuest.
Last updated on
July 7, 2000. Based on a template
from The WebQuest
Page
|